“GALA 2009: The Language of Business. The Business of Language.” is our association’s first step towards creating a new “must do” industry-wide event. GALA is moving to emulate that which works well for the vast majority of successful trade associations. It is our goal to create an umbrella event that invites all segments of our industry into “the tent” so that we can learn and share and network with one another.

Our industry must move away from the current glut of far too many small overlapping and often repetitive meetings. Great meetings offer a broad palette of workshops, education, services and networking opportunities. Great meetings include the large and small players in the industry, and by their nature they bring larger and more diverse audiences to all of those partners in the industry.

It is ironic that our first step simply creates another meeting in an already overcrowded field; some observers have focused on that apparent contradiction. The simple truth is that you cannot get to step two without taking step one. I expect the GALA annual meeting will attract thousands of attendees several years down the road but you don’t just snap your fingers and put on a great event. You build it.

It is important to remember that this “new” event is the result of a long and involved survey and planning process on the part of GALA’s membership that came together in a 2007 document called the 2010 Plan. That document outlined core actions that our member companies determined were necessary for our association and our industry to grow. At the base of that plan is a belief that “a rising tide raises all ships” along with a desire from our membership to develop and manage our own industry events. We all know that we are still a low-visibility industry. We know that many thousands of potential end users would benefit from our products and services but they don’t know who we are or what we do. Great meetings not only allow us to communicate with each other, they allow us to tell our story to the world.

Our program committee of Aki Ito, Kim Harris, Hans Fenstermacher and Kevin Fountoukidis is focused solely on developing great workshops for this event. Our board and program committee are currently reviewing a remarkable group of potential keynote speakers. We recognize that modern associations address the needs of the entire person and we have made this meeting both user friendly and family friendly. It is a good thing for great meetings to also be fun. It is smart to be family friendly. And it is smart to be in a beautiful location that encourages networking and communication.

We are building something new here and I invite all of you to join us. I want you to be a participant but I hope you will also be an architect as you contribute your ideas as to how we will make GALA 2010 better, bigger and even more valuable to you individually. I hope to see you in Cancun.

Please visit our event Web site at www.language-of-business.org.

Best regards,

James F. Hollan III, CAE
Executive Director
Globalization and Localization Association

GALA is pleased to announce the dates for its first annual conference and exhibition.

GALA 2009: The language of business. The business of language.
14 – 16 September 2009
J. W. Marriott
Cancun, Mexico

We hope that you and your colleagues will plan to join us for GALA’s first major event.

Location: Cancun, Mexico
More Information: www.language-of-business.org

The new center is part of IBM’s strategy to set up similar centers in Europe and Asia that will offer document translation in multiple languages, an IBM spokeswoman said on Monday.

Besides having staff translate documents, such as e-mail messages, Web pages, and contracts, the center in Pune will also use technology developed by IBM’s research lab in India, and tools available in the market, to automate some of this translation work, she added.

The center will be part of IBM’s fourth delivery center for application services and consulting in Pune, inaugurated Monday. The new Pune center is spread over 180,000 square feet and will house close to 2,000 employees once fully staffed, IBM said.

IBM has been expanding fast in India, and at the end of December it had 73,000 staff in the country.

Nova Translation Ltd. is a leading professional English Turkish translation service provider. We deliver fast, accurate and reliable professional English translation services at competitive prices for United States English, English for the United Kingdom, or any other specific market required. We specialize in high-volume and complex professional English translations.

We provide professional American English translation and British English translation solutions to some of the world’s best known companies. Nova Translation takes great pride in providing our clients with high quality professional American English translations and British English translations at competitive prices.

We are in a unique position to deal with any type of professional English translation project you may have. From small law firms to large multinational corporations, Nova Translation brings extensive experience in English professional translations to your organization.
English Turkish Translations

Fluent communication in the English language is a core competency for every business looking to be successful in the 21st century. Professional and direct communication in English translations is more important than ever. The quality of your English translations is a direct reflection on you and your business. As a leading provider of professional English translations, we will concentrate on what we do best, allowing you to do what you do best.

No matter the type of content of your English translations, we have teams of professional English translators with relevant knowledge and experience in the field. Besides being able to understand the nuances of each type of English, they have expertise in the following areas: financial, IT, sales, marketing, media, legal, travel, software, consumer, business, telecom, recruitment, technical, PR, medical, governmental, insurance and books.

Turkish to English and Englsih to Turkish Translation

While we specialize in Turkish to English translation and English to Turkish translation services, we frequently translate English documents from and into French, German, Italian, Korean, Chinese and Japanese using experienced, native, industry-specific English translators.
American English Translation and British English Translation

Why choose Nova Translation for your Turkish to English translations and English to Turkish translations?

We are proud of our excellent reputation for reliable and high quality Turkish to English and English to Turkish translations. We have assembled teams of British translators and American translators, with an array of skills and specialties, working with American English and British English. We custom fit the knowledge and strengths of our English translator teams to your specific project and to your specific English-speaking market needs.
Expert English Translator Teams

The service performed by our professional American English translator and British English translator teams includes editing and proofreading by independent experts at no additional charge. Our teams of expert American English translators and British English translators also offer English edition and English proofreading for translations completed by another source.

English Language Variations

The English language contains many different dialects and our English translation teams can tailor your documents to the needs of the intended recipient or market. The English found in the United States, Great Britain, Canada, Australia, South Africa, and Hong Kong, among others, can vary greatly in regards to certain aspects of spelling, vocabulary, numbering, grammar, and tone.

Our English translation team can create a translation for a particular audience, or translate your project into Global English, the standardized, international form of the language. Global English has become the lingua franca of the twenty-first century, and is employed in international business and diplomacy.

The IMTT Conference has become the most innovative training event in Latin America, offering the opportunity to share knowledge, network, and learn in an environment of collaboration.

Participate actively in our next meeting and join the industry experts for an enriching debate and take advantage of the best business and networking opportunities. This is your chance to get to know your future clients and vendors, promote your company, reinforce sales and increase your business. Get involved.

http://www.imtt.com.ar

He was angry.

Frustrated at the lack of coverage and the poor way critics treated many writers, O’Brien began the Review of Contemporary Fiction as a way to give visibility to lesser known writers. Later on he began the Dalkey Archive Press, a nonprofit publishing house that publishes and promotes literature from around the world.

“This all began because I wanted to vent. The problem with that, though, is sometimes, when you start venting, it becomes successful and then you become a part of the mainstream that you were protesting against,” he said. “So we have to constantly reinvent ourselves to keep our counter-culture roots.”

O’Brien, who travels the world looking for literary masterpieces to translate into English, was the speaker for the American Book Review reading series on Thursday at the University of Houston-Victoria. Although fighting a cold and suffering from jet lag from a Tokyo flight, O’Brien kept the audience captivated by discussing the changing face of the publishing world both here and abroad.

One of the biggest changes in publishing happened in the late 1970s and early 1980s, he said. American writers took precedence over foreign writers by critics and the major publishing houses began to change as the founders stepped down and corporations took over.

“Literature that they used to publish began to disappear, including drama, poetry, translations and experimental fiction,” O’Brien said. “This allowed small presses to publish authors they never thought they would, which was a great thing.”

But even with small presses picking up the slack, translated books only make up about 2.5 percent of the 250,000 books published each year in the U.S.

“In the last 30 years, the U.S. has isolated itself from world literature and that has political consequences,” he said. “Our position on art has become our political position. We got in a position where we just don’t know what the rest of the world is writing. And it’s not on the part of the readers, but it’s the media, publishers and book stores.”

The assumption by those institutions is that the American people are not interested in reading literature that has been translated from another language.

“There’s a whole new generation of French writers that are doing wonderful things but those books will probably never see the light of day in the U.S.,” he added.

With major publishing houses worried about the future of the industry as new technology changes how people read, translated books will be the first on the chopping block. Luckily, there is hope.

“It’s terrifying but it does leave room for small publishers to do wonderful things,” he said. “It’s an interesting time for the publishing world right now.”

With 14 federal marshals lining the courtroom, Eastern District of New York Judge John Gleeson warned the audience against emotional outbursts, but the verdict was met with near silence. With its pro se defendant, sensational charges and furtive peeks behind the closed doors of the secretive Satmar society, United States v. Weingarten has transfixed the Brooklyn legal community.

Following the announcement of the verdict, Weingarten, who appeared pro se, told the court, “As I said to the judge in the beginning, I need adjournment because I was unprepared and I was denied that.” Gleeson responded, “You have your objection, you have my ruling. I’ll see you [for sentencing] on April 3.”

The victim, surrounded by five marshals, sat in the front left aisle; six of Weingarten’s other seven children, who claim their father is innocent, sat in the front right. Afterwards, the victim compared being cross-examined by her father to “being molested again.”

Asked why she came to hear the verdict announced, she said, “Because I’ve been waiting my whole life for this, since I was 10 years old.” The other six children, who accuse their mother and the victim of molesting them, said their father has already selected an attorney who will begin representing him prior to sentencing, though they declined to name the attorney.

Weingarten faces up to 10 years on each count, which can run consecutively at the court’s discretion, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

WEINGARTEN’S DEFENSE

Weingarten had appeared in court defending himself against the charges for the past two weeks. In his closing arguments Tuesday, Weingarten focused on the inconsistencies in the government’s case.

After Weingarten’s daughter testified in graphic detail of years of molestation and sodomy at her father’s hands, and his ex-wife told the jury about the beatings that kept both her and her daughter from reporting the abuse, Weingarten declined to take the stand.

Instead, in Tuesday’s meandering and often indecipherable closings, he attempted to sow doubt by pointing out numerous minute contradictions in the testimony against him — the time of day a fight took place, the side of the bed the daughter slept in, whether she massaged his stomach before or after he allegedly forced her hand down his pants.

“Those such of things aren’t small and the slightest things,” Weingarten said in thickly accented English during his closing. “If two things contradict each other, we have no justice. It shows it’s a setup.

“Everything is contradicted, from top to bottom, from one place to another place.” Weingarten told the jury. “Nothing is true.”

Since the trial began, Eastern District of New York Judge John Gleeson’s courtroom has been filled to capacity with prosecutors, Chasidic Jews, reporters and off-duty courthouse personnel. U.S. Attorney Benton J. Campbell watched Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrea Goldbarg’s opening arguments. Judge Nicholas Garaufis watched her examine witnesses. Many of the court reporters and Yiddish translators assigned to the case, when not on duty, joined the audience. When asked if she was still on duty, one translator said she was merely “kibbitzing.”

JUDICIAL BALANCING ACT

Weingarten’s case landed in federal court because of the victim’s claims that her father transported her back and forth between New York, Israel and Belgium to facilitate the sexual abuse.

From the beginning, the case had tested Gleeson’s ability to balance the defendant’s right to a fair trial with a judge’s duty to follow the basic rules of evidence and trial practice.

With a pro se defendant, “Your choice is either to enforce [the rules], and make it really hard for this person to function without objection, or not enforce them and give them a kind of benefit,” said Daniel C. Richman, a Columbia Law School professor of criminal procedure.

That difficult balancing act has contributed to a “prevailing theme in the Supreme Court in recent decades of, yes, there is this right, and yes, it will be protected, but we’re not real happy with it,” Richman added. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled, for example, that judges may impose counsel at trial or deny pro se representation on appeal.

In defending his case, Weingarten — who has been identified in the press as a rabbi, though members of the Chasidic community confirmed that he is a “rebbe,” the Yiddish word for teacher — demonstrated why courts may resist pro se defendants.

At the outset, Gleeson repeatedly encouraged Weingarten to accept representation, advising him that an attorney would stand a much better chance of gaining an acquittal. Following Weingarten’s steadfast refusal, Gleeson spent the next two weeks trying to curtail the defendant’s digressions, his departures from the rules of evidence, his occasional chastising of witnesses and his frequent interruptions of the judge himself.

Gleeson, who is known for keeping attorneys on a short leash, employed a strategy of strong language imparted in soft tones.

“Stop interrupting me” and “move on, move on” delivered in a measured voice were the judge’s mantras throughout the case.

Gleeson might have seemed a tough draw for Weingarten. The judge worked as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in New York’s Eastern District, the same office prosecuting this case, for nearly a decade, ultimately as the chief of the criminal division, before joining the bench in 1994. He also has two daughters of his own.

As one veteran defense attorney predicted early in the trial, “Gleeson’s biggest challenge will be to not lose his temper.”

The judge, however, demonstrated deep reserves of patience, at least in front of the jury.

He generally allowed Weingarten wide breadth regarding the most common pitfalls for pro se defendants, such as hearsay issues and confusing questioning with testifying.

And his chastisements, though frequent, were generally gentle. When Weingarten became frustrated by a series of sustained objections while cross-examining his daughter, Gleeson calmly told him, “There are problems that go along with deciding to represent yourself. It’s hard.”

Indeed, the difficult balance between a fair trial and rewarding the defendant for refusing counsel was never more evident than during Weingarten’s cross-examination of his daughter.

Before a packed courtroom, Weingarten attempted to elicit seemingly minor inconsistencies in his daughter’s horrific story. Gleeson sat at the edge of his podium, just a few feet above the daughter’s right shoulder, giving her a visible sense of protection, while also requiring her to answer her father’s questions. She frequently turned and addressed the judge directly, asking if she had to answer a question, telling him she could not understand what her father meant.

At one point, when Weingarten angrily raised his voice, his daughter seemed to quizzically ask the judge, “Objection?” though no such objection was recorded in the transcript. In any case, Gleeson paused, then answered, “Sustained.”

MOMENTS OF FRUSTRATION

By the end of her two days on the stand, the daughter, now 27, seemed to have gained strength. When Weingarten, who tended to speak in the third person, asked her about “your father,” she said, “No, it was you, it was you who did that.”

During sidebars and when the jury was adjourned, the judge expressed his frustrations more freely.

On one such occasion, Weingarten asked for a sidebar after the prosecution’s direct examination of his ex-wife.

The ex-wife had testified about, among other things, the day her daughter revealed the years of abuse.

Weingarten complained that the Yiddish translator had been inaccurate.

Gleeson asked for an example, and Weingarten said that when his ex-wife testified that he had returned to the United Stated to visit his dying father, the translator had translated dying as merely “sick.”

“And you think that was the important part” of the testimony? Gleeson asked, in evident exasperation. “You can ask her about that on cross-examination,” he said, then brusquely walked out of the courtroom.

With his refusal to heed advice and orders, the defendant frustrated most everyone involved in the case, perhaps his legal advisors, Barry Rhodes and Alan Stutman, most of all.

In a heated discussion just before the jury entered the courtroom to hear Weingarten’s closings Tuesday, an angry Rhodes could be heard telling Weingarten, “That’s a little different than what you said before. But you know something? That’s not true either.”

On the third day, baby Rosa Maria Rivera died in a police cruiser on the way back to the hospital where her mother had already been turned away.

The cause of death: dehydration.

The baby’s mother, Ana Aldorondo, later said she was convinced that she and her child received substandard care because she could not speak English.

The tragedy, on Jan. 17, 1973, mobilized Hartford’s Latino community to make changes in the city’s health care system that improved the quality of care for the city’s Puerto Rican population.

But 36 years later, one thing has not changed.

At least 22,000 low-income Connecticut residents who do not speak English well still cannot be sure they will understand or be understood when they arrive at hospitals or clinics for care.

How much longer must we wait?

Two years ago, advocates for people with limited English proficiency thought the struggle to get Medicaid reimbursement for face-to-face medical interpreters was over when the legislature put $4.7 million in the state budget to pay for the services.

But still patients continued to rely on untrained hospital housekeepers, friends, relatives, even young children for interpretation while the state dragged its feet in releasing the money.

Now, Gov. M. Jodi Rell has cut funding for medical interpretation from the fiscal year 2009-2010 budget. It is, she says, one of the many hard choices the state must make in the face of a gaping budget hole that over the next two years is estimated at anywhere from $6 billion to $8 billion.

But cutting spending for medical interpretation won’t save money.

In fact, allowing people to leave a hospital or doctor’s office without understanding their diagnosis, what tests they need, how to take their medicine or how to change their diet probably costs Connecticut far more than the cost of paying qualified medical interpreters.

The cost to taxpayers for medical interpretation is small. Because 50 cents of every dollar paid through the Medicaid program is reimbursed by the federal government, the actual cost of providing the service is only $2.35 million a year for Connecticut taxpayers.

And in February, Congress upped the amount the federal government will pay for language services for children covered by Medicaid to 75 percent of the cost.

And what of the human cost?

Ask anybody at The Hispanic Health Council and they’ll tell you about clients whose health care has been compromised because they don’t speak English very well.

There was the woman from Peru who collapsed in her hospital room from a post-partum hemorrhage because a nurse did not understand her repeated complaints about excessive bleeding after childbirth.

There was the man from Brazil who made repeated visits to a public clinic seeking medication after a friend he had brought along to translate told him the doctor said he had a sexually transmitted disease. It turned out that the doctor told the man he did not have a disease, and thus needed no medicine.

Connecticut’s population has become so diverse that 65 different languages are spoken by low-income residents with limited English proficiency.

The state needs an effective, efficient, transparent and high-quality system that provides not only direct translation but cultural sensitivity. We may never know how many other deaths have occurred because of misunderstandings in the medical community. We do know that when people are unable to communicate with their doctors, serious and costly mistakes can occur.

Let’s not wait for another baby to die before we seriously commit to providing medical interpreters.

In the medical world, quality translations are not a matter of luxury. They are critical! Nova Translation Ltd.  provides translation services to hospitals, medical equipment manufacturers, pharmaceutical firms, clinicians, and researchers. Because localization demands total accuracy and zero tolerance for misinterpretation, we employ over 100 translators across the globe, each located in a country where their native language is spoken. Translator of Nova Translation works closely with clients to ensure that translations are 100% accurate and exceed the clients’ expectations.
How big is the medical translation challenge in the Turkey?

Acquiring medical translation services is becoming increasingly more necessary, even for Turkish companies who do not sell their products outside Turkey. In Turkey today, approximately 5 million Turkish people over the age of five – about a fifth of the population-speak a language other than Turkish at home, and almost half of these Turkish people do not speak Turkish as their native tongue. This represents a significant segment of the medical, pharmaceutical and health care market which must be addressed in different languages.

Market  – Europe

To sell products in Europe, all non-European manufacturers must comply with the European language requirements of the countries to which they export. European Union (EU) regulatory requirements regarding medical products have cast the localization industry into the spotlight, especially since the regulations dictated in the council directives concerning In-Vitro Diagnostic devices (MDD and IVD Directives) began requiring that documentation for devices be translated into the native language of the countries where they are used and being sold.

Basically, three European directives directly and exclusively address medical device equipment: Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices (the AIMD Directive) Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 (Medical Device Directive)
Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on in-vitro diagnostic (In-Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Directive)

These directives instruct and regulate manufacturers concerning the way they are to present their products within the European Union. The EU has enacted specific mandatory safety requirements for “MD” and has also allowed the European Member States to determine additional, country-specific requirements for manufacturers. Annex I, point 13 of the MDD states, “each device must be accompanied by the information needed to use it safely and to identify the manufacturer, taking account of the training and knowledge of the potential users. This information comprises the details on the label and the data in the instructions for use.” The next paragraph hints at the translation requirements stating that: “Member States may require the information, which must be made available to the user and the patient in accordance with Annex I, point 13, to be in their national language(s) or in another community language when a device reaches the final user, regardless of whether it is for professional or other use.”

Market  – Asia

Translation is also an important step for companies wanting to export their products to Asia. Most Asian countries have their own mandatory product safety standards for selected product categories.

In August 2003, China started requiring compliance with a new regulation called the China Compulsory Certification Scheme (CCC Scheme). The Scheme requires manufacturers of products subject to compulsory certification-including audio products, wire and cable, telecommunications equipment, household appliances, safety glass, motor vehicle tires and firefighting equipment, among other things – to apply the new CCC Mark to their products, indicating compliance with the governmental safety requirements.  See CCC Mark for more information.

China is not the only Asian country with entry requirements for MD products. Regulated products under the DENAN law in Japan are categorized as specified products (SPs) and non-specified products (NSPs). Products falling under the scope of South Korea’s Electrical Appliance Safety Law, also known as the Safety Certification Scheme, require all manufacturers to obtain a mandatory South Korean Safety Mark (EK-mark) before placing products on the South Korean market. In Taiwan, the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA), part of the Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection (BSMI), recently issued its Measures Governing Registration of Product Certification (RPC). These mandatory Taiwanese certifications cover both electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and safety requirements. The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) issues the ISI (Indian Standards Institution) Mark to qualified products in every industry from agriculture and textiles to electrical and electronic products.

What do all of these regulations mean for manufacturers of MD?

Manufacturers must submit their technical documents, as well as their product labeling, operating instructions, and manuals in the local language of the country where they will be used.

Nova’s translators are specializedin medical fields

Specialized fields require specialized knowledge, and medicine is a highly specialized field. To eliminate the risk of errors in your translation, we make it a rule to recruit only true professionals from the medical industry as translators. Most of these translation professionals have been engaged in the production of all types of medical-related documentation for various sized businesses for many years. This experience in the field of medicine has provided them with expert knowledge of the industry language and the jargon necessary for accurate translations.

Nova Translation translates a diverse range of medical documentation, including:

*    MD software (UI)
*    Online help files
*    User guides
*    Patents
*    Data sheets
*    Regulatory documents
*    Reports
*    Registration documents
*    Expert reports
*    Dossiers

Whatever your translation needs are, Nova Translation has a cost-effective solution that ensures that you get your products to market, conform to local regulations, and convey your message accurately and professionally.

Find out about the European language requirements.

In a recent article, Don DePalma questions the assumption that corporate software users can always “get by” in English, particularly in the growing field of content management. He also explains that using localized content management programs can save foreign companies money in the long run.

“We always argue for buying localized software; that is, products whose interfaces and documentation have been translated, and whose features have been adapted to the business, cultural, or logistical needs of its target markets,” he emphasizes. “In an ideal world, you’ll find that the supplier for your U.S. headquarters’ CMS [Content Management System] also supports French, German, Japanese, and Russian variants, with the administrative interfaces and developer tools adapted for use in those markets.”

Indeed, people worldwide prefer to read, work, and – especially – buy in their own language. That’s why the localization process can help your company reach out to more consumers. Nova Translation, LTD. provides localization and other language services to major corporations in the USA and worldwide. Don’t hesitate to contact us for more information.